
yqiu
- Total activity 27
- Last activity
- Member since
- Following 0 users
- Followed by 0 users
- Votes 7
- Subscriptions 5
Comments
Recent activity by yqiu Sort by recent activity-
Thanks for the quick response and suggestions! I tried them separately. Unfortunately, neither parameter can rescue the variants. I tried --initial-tumor-lod 1 and --active-probability-threshold d...
-
Hi Genevieve, Thanks for the response and the link you shared is very useful. But it may not directly relate to my question. I get that there are some reads are uninformative and they are not count...
-
Hi Genevieve, Thanks for the detailed response! Do you have any suggestions about which parameter to adjust and suggested values? Or should I adjust both of them? For --initial-tumor-lod, should I ...
-
Hi Genevieve, Thanks for the response! Please see the answers to your questions below. Here is the SNV as called in GATK 4.1.8.1. CHROM POS . C T . . AS_SB_TABLE=9605,9821|113...
-
Thanks a lot for the suggestion! Following your previous advise, we did use --max-reads-per-alignment-start to 0 in both GATK 4.1.8 and GATK 4.2 in the results I mentioned above.
-
Hi Genevieve, Sorry for the delay in response. Thanks for the suggestion. We have no problems when disable subsampling as you suggested. Best, Yunjiang
-
Hi Genevieve, Thanks a lot for the prompt reply. Could you help explain a little bit more about why "Not necessarily 4000 would be a subset of 12000"? There might be something about downsampling t...
-
Hi Genevieve, Thanks a lot for the suggestion and explanation with downsampling. We will disable downsampling for amplicon data. But it still unclear to me why there are reads with --max-reads-per...
-
Thanks a lot for the suggestion! We will disable downsampling for now as you suggested. But it would be great to learn about the reason underlying downsampling though we do understand it is non-tri...
-
Sorry for the confusion. Yes. All the data we showed are amplicon data without UMIs.