Bamout haplotypes are much worse than bamout tumor reads would suggest
Background: I was triaging a particular passing variant call from Mutect2 (there was no evidence for this variant in the original BAMs), so I ran Mutect2 again producing the bamout.
Top panel = Artifical Haplotypes; Bottom panel = Tumor alignments (from bamout)
It seems there is a pretty noisy re-alignment going on; however, what I'm more confused about is: shouldn't the tumor alignments in the bamout reflect the realignments that occurred in Mutect2? I was hoping to see why all of these variants were showing up when my input reads were looking pretty clean overall.
-
Hi, please note that your question was posted while the GATK Team was Out of Office.
Please repost any outstanding GATK issues and we will get to them if possible. Our first priority is solving GATK issues and abnormal results, see our support policy for more details.
Please sign in to leave a comment.
1 comment