If not an error, choose a category for your question(REQUIRED):
c) Why do I see a large number of false positive (especially germlines) after calling somatic variants by Mutect2?
d) Where do I find the best way to decrease false positive rates without compromising sensitivity?
I used GATK/Mutect 2 (GenomeAnalysisTk/184.108.40.206) to call somatic variants using tumor-normal pairs. The default setting was used throughout, following the best practice protocol. However, I found lots of false positives (many appear germline variants, seen in the blood as well). By quick inspection of 113 variants from the original BAMs on IGV, I found only 35% of true positive rate. For example, the following variants, which are obviously germline on IGV (source is BAM), are called as somatic.
My question are :
1) What are the known true positive rate for GATK2 (220.127.116.11)
2) Any suggestion for option arguments or filtering to remove these obvious false positives without compromising sensitivity?
3) Or am I simply doing this wrong? Any comments/suggestions are appreciated.
Please sign in to leave a comment.